Point Shaving :: essays research papers

I think that its a tragedy to cypher that many collegiate athletes are involved in looseness situations. Its hard on the athletes too, because theyre not getting paid to play the secret plan so its hard to resist thousands of dollars to only win by a few, in cases on point grazing. When I was watching that movie relentless Chips, which is all about illegal college betting and buying athletes to come to their school, there was a scene involving the coach and the point guard regarding a point shaving incident three years ago. After the student was harassed by the coach he finally confessed saying, We won the game, we just didnt beat the spread. Thats only for those gamblers anyway. He has a point with what he said just now thats not the point. A lot of young athletes do run through point shaving as partaking in an illegal and unlawful event or dont believe that much in it, morally.So race say that if the college players were getting paid none of this would happen. I dont know i f giving the players a stipend is going end this because unless youre stipendiary the athletes thousands of dollars a week or a game, the stipend wont be more than what theyre being offered. I do think that it power help but Im not sure if that help is going to make a big enough difference. On the same note, if you uproot spreads, can they be sure that it will make a difference when it comes to gambling. Dont get me wrong, eliminating the spreads would decrease the amounts of point shaving incidents, but it wont necessarily stop them. Bookies can make up their own spreads and ask players to shave points regardless of the fact that the spread is not publicized. The bookie has an image by about how much one team may beat another. I understand that they will probably never eliminate collegiate gambling but theyre trying to limit and reduce it and Im all for it too.Unfortunately there is the big issue of the politicians and their campaigning for funds and its going to be hard to cont rol that too. I can understand why Congress isnt closing the Nevada loophole or at least delaying it, but I still dont agree with it.